Every time I start writing a new post in this blog, I just give a glimpse to older ones and then I've always thought that the prior post was too foolish to write but still i manage to stop my impulses to delete the whole blog and start afresh. So I find myself wiser every time I write and thus every time there's a seemingly wiser post among the whole lot of silly ones. This post is about the same issue regarding me, am i living with them or are they living with me... i mean, the fools. I am certainly not a very intelligent kind but then most of us aren't really, barring few. Then whom to call a real fool, one who understands at least partially the basis behind all realities or the one who knows how to get the best out of the current realities. There's no point discussing the one's who are in between these two i.e. keeping a balance between the two things, they are like most of us and they are certainly the fools. A possible example of this would be the research papers. Most of us who are in writing things know how research papers go, i mean, most research papers can be dumped if each one is critically analysed thoroughly on all the grounds or at least the result can be shown to be otherwise but still each next author believes at least some of such research papers to get his things published, in that way, it is just about publishing and increasing your papers without even thinking as to what effect it would have on the truth.A person knowing these realities and knowing reasons behind it may well refrain from writing most of his papers and would be the lesser known kind while the one knowing what sells would be spoiling the truth without knowing, so who's the fool. Well I see most of the people lying in the category of moderation i.e. trying to do both the things at the same time and as i've already said I consider this as foolishness, now as till now I've not been able to think as to take which side i myself am a fool.Rather, my earlier contentions regarding "being conceptual" or being introspective are all failing now as probably that is not needed. People are wanting somebody who is travelling in the middle keeping his vision away from both the extremes and I'm failing at most junctures. At such point is it necessary to revise all what I'd thought would be needed for being successful or I should completely start afresh. I've recently read this extremely foolish bestseller "the monk who sold his ferrari", and Robin S sharma is the kind who knows what sells as he himself must be knowing when you say "you should see nothing but the goal and never stop before reaching that" an equally good saying can be that "Reaching at the goal is not the only thing, the effort behind gives the real pleasure when you reach it", so while the first saying would mean any effort, the second would be more about the kind of effort.Well, till now I've found that every place has few really "non-foolish" people i.e. whom i consider "non-foolish".
No comments:
Post a Comment